Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Studies

Hack for Humanity 2026: Mis/Disinformation

Breadcrumb

Hack for Humanity 2026: Mis/Disinformation

About Hack for Humanity

Organized by the Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Studies, Hack for Humanity is an annual humanitarian-focused project competition at Brown University that brings together students to learn about the most pressing needs in the human rights and humanitarian sphere. This year’s competition will focus on the theme of mis/disinformation and will take place November 7-8. Students will collaborate over two days to design innovative social programs and policies, community-based interventions, or technologies that address this challenge. 

The winning team is eligible to receive a $3,000 seed grant.

Sign up your team here

Premise

Misinformation and disinformation spread fast and far, eroding peoples’ trust in public institutions, science, and the news, and creating disagreements that fracture communities, undermining our ability to work together. Far from being a purely online issue, false and deceptive information fuels real-world harm—undermining public health campaigns, driving political polarization, exploiting vulnerable populations, and weakening democratic processes worldwide.

Stopping the spread of false information isn't just a technical challenge; it requires coordinated response across sectors of technology, science, and policy-making, and calls for media literacy and community organizing. Effective solutions must go beyond basic fact-checking to address why people fall for misleading narratives in the first place. 

Objective

This year’s hackathon will focus on how to better prepare for, identify, and respond to misinformation and disinformation. Students will collaborate over two days to design innovative programs, systems, or policies that address this challenge. Potential areas of focus include strengthening media literacy and critical thinking, combating health and scientific misinformation, curbing election interference and political manipulation, detecting deepfakes and AI-generated content, protecting vulnerable groups from targeted scam campaigns, building community-level networks, and holding digital platforms accountable. 

Please note: You do not need coding or technical experience to participate—your team’s pitch could take the form of a social program, educational campaign, policy proposal, technology concept, or other innovative approach to addressing misinformation and/or disinformation.

While your team has the flexibility to explore any aspect of misinformation and disinformation, we have provided a list of potential subtopics to help guide your focus. It will also be important to incorporate cross-cutting issues—such as equity, justice, human rights, and community resilience—as you develop your project pitch.

Potential Subtopics to Consider

Cross-Cutting Themes

As misinformation and disinformation continue to spread, their social, economic, political, legal, and cultural effects are felt across all sectors of society. Even so, these effects are not evenly distributed. Digital manipulation and misleading content disproportionately harm the most vulnerable members of the global community, including but not limited to racial and ethnic minorities, non-native language speakers, low-income populations, older adults, and other disadvantaged or marginalized groups.

We ask that your team take these issues into consideration as you work on your project pitch to ensure your solutions are inclusive and reach those that are disproportionately affected by misinformation and disinformation.

Keynote Speaker

  • Man in white button down shirt smiling in front of the ocean.

    Jonathan Corpus Ong

    Professor of Communication in the University of Massachusetts at Amherst

    Jonathan Corpus Ong is Professor of Communication in the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. He is co-author of the study “Architects of Networked Disinformation: Behind the Scenes of Fake News Production in the Philippines”, cited as among the “most valuable” research in disinformation studies by the Poynter Institute. He is Executive Director of Sigla Research Center, an NGO that pursues sociological and community-driven research in the tech and democracy space.

Mentors

  • Woman in blazer smiling.

    Ieva Jusionyte

    Director, Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Studies, Watson Family University Professor of International Security and Anthropology

Evaluation Framework

OriginalityProvides a fresh approach to the challenge or utilizes innovative methods.
Respect for Individuals/CommunitiesAimed at addressing needs as defined by the people who are most impacted, and protects the privacy and rights of individuals. 
ContextLeverages existing local resources and knowledge. Respects indigenous material and improvised solutions and either builds upon those or considers them in design.
FeasibilityConsiders logistics of delivery and access, including political, cultural, technological, educational, and infrastructure requirements for delivery and use. 
ImpactHas the potential to make a significant difference in people's lives. Also considers questions of cost vs. benefits, i.e. resources required to produce and deliver solution vs. benefits to individuals. 
SustainabilityRespects relevant time frame for the context, matching the duration of solution to the likely duration of the need. 
PartnershipsConsiders relevant stakeholders and partners, including local and international as well as private and public. Considers how relevant organizations would be involved in use or delivery.

The main purpose of a pitch presentation is to show your proposed solution as an innovative, feasible project. Working along each of the components of the rubric is the key to having a successful pitch, though students may structure their presentation in any way that is appropriate. To show originality and impact, we suggest that students include mission statements that highlight their project's overall goals. 

 Additionally, through research students can find specific data regarding the impact and feasibility of the project, including cost projections, existing infrastructure, and/or necessary technology for the proposed solution. To be successful in this competition, teams should aim to address each of the points outlined in the rubric.