Skip to Main Content
Brown University
Brown University

Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Studies

Search Menu

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • About
    • Director's Letter
    • People
    • Annual Reports
    • Partnerships
  • Research
    • Core Research
    • Seed Grants
    • Affiliated Faculty Research
    • Publications
  • Programs
    • Civil-Military Humanitarian Coordination
  • Opportunities
    • For Students
    • For Faculty
  • Education
    • Core Training
    • Courses
    • Hack for Humanity
    • Student Clinic for Immigrant Justice (SCIJ)
    • Training Seed Grants
    • Student Internships
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Event Archive
    • Webcasts
  • News
    • Current Emergencies
    • In the News
    • Community Spotlight
Search
Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Studies

Decrypting the Encryption Debate: A Framework for Decision Makers

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Research
  • Affiliated Faculty Research

Brown Faculty: Seny Kamara, Associate Professor of Computer Science

Publications: Decrypting the Encryption Debate: A Framework for Decision Makers

Encryption protects information stored on smartphones, laptops, and other devices - in some cases by default. Encrypted communications are provided by widely used computing devices and services - such as smartphones, laptops, and messaging applications - that are used by hundreds of millions of users. Individuals, organizations, and governments rely on encryption to counter threats from a wide range of actors, including unsophisticated and sophisticated criminals, foreign intelligence agencies, and repressive governments. Encryption on its own does not solve the challenge of providing effective security for data and systems, but it is an important tool.

At the same time, encryption is relied on by criminals to avoid investigation and prosecution, including criminals who may unknowingly benefit from default settings as well as those who deliberately use encryption. Thus, encryption complicates law enforcement and intelligence investigations. When communications are encrypted "end-to-end," intercepted messages cannot be understood. When a smartphone is locked and encrypted, the contents cannot be read if the phone is seized by investigators.

Decrypting the Encryption Debate reviews how encryption is used, including its applications to cybersecurity; its role in protecting privacy and civil liberties; the needs of law enforcement and the intelligence community for information; technical and policy options for accessing plaintext; and the international landscape. This book describes the context in which decisions about providing authorized government agencies access to the plaintext version of encrypted information would be made and identifies and characterizes possible mechanisms and alternative means of obtaining information.

Brown University
Providence RI 02912 401-863-1000

Quick Navigation

  • Visit Brown
  • Campus Map
  • A to Z
  • Contact Us

Footer Navigation

  • News
  • Events
  • Campus Safety
  • Accessibility
  • Jobs at Watson
Give To Brown

© Brown University

Brown University
For You
Search Menu

Mobile Site Navigation

    Mobile Site Navigation

    • Home
    • About
      • Director's Letter
      • People
      • Annual Reports
      • Partnerships
    • Research
      • Core Research
      • Seed Grants
      • Affiliated Faculty Research
      • Publications
    • Programs
      • Civil-Military Humanitarian Coordination
    • Opportunities
      • For Students
      • For Faculty
    • Education
      • Core Training
      • Courses
      • Hack for Humanity
      • Student Clinic for Immigrant Justice (SCIJ)
      • Training Seed Grants
      • Student Internships
    • Events
      • Upcoming Events
      • Event Archive
      • Webcasts
    • News
      • Current Emergencies
      • In the News
      • Community Spotlight
All of Brown.edu People
Advanced Search
Close Search

Decrypting the Encryption Debate: A Framework for Decision Makers